Crypto assets should not be legal tender, but a ban is not an easy option
New Delhi, Sep 7, 2023
The joint report of the IMF and FSB is part of the ongoing G20 deliberations on regulating crypto assets
Crypto assets should not be granted official currency or legal tender status, and central banks should also avoid holding crypto assets in their official reserve as they pose a risk to monetary and global financial stability, the synthesis paper by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and Financial Stability Board (FSB) has said. The report has also stressed the need for an unambiguous tax treatment of crypto assets and advised countries to safeguard monetary sovereignty.
The joint report of the IMF and FSB is part of the ongoing G20 deliberations on regulating crypto assets. Outlining the fiscal risks, the synthesis paper said that if crypto assets were granted legal tender status, government revenues could be exposed to exchange rate risk. Crypto assets do not fulfil the three basic conditions of "currency", including unit of account, means of exchange, and store of value.
At the same time, the report has said that blanket bans that make all crypto-asset activities illegal can be costly and technically demanding to enforce. A decision to ban is not an "easy option," the report said, while adding that temporary restrictions should not substitute for robust macroeconomic policies.
"Developing effective frameworks and policies is the best way to limit substitution into crypto assets," the report said. Credible institutional frameworks and comprehensive regulation and oversight are the first line of defence against the macroeconomic and financial risks posed by crypto assets.
Calling for comprehensive regulatory and supervisory oversight of crypto assets, the report has also recommended that countries should avoid large deficits and high debt levels and adopt an effective monetary policy framework to avoid the use of crypto assets for payment.
Governments, however, should minimise fiscal and operational risks in cases of official crypto asset use by keeping official payment use limited to avoid exposing government revenues to variations in crypto-asset prices, the report said.
"The growing use and integration of crypto assets in the global financial system has necessitated a coordinated set of international standards that form a comprehensive policy toolkit, as well as the effective implementation of these standards," the joint report said further. It said that the borderless nature of the crypto-asset ecosystem limits the effectiveness of individual national regulation.
The FSB and IMF have also drawn attention towards money laundering, terrorist financing, and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction risks associated with virtual assets and asked countries to identify and take appropriate steps to manage and mitigate those risks, including the adoption of Financial Action Task Force standards.
"Pseudonymous crypto assets can undermine tax revenue collection and compliance since withholding taxes and third-party information could be challenging to collect."
Policymakers should also take steps to guard against excessive capital flow volatility, such as clarifying the legal status of crypto assets. The IMF-FSB paper warned that if capital flow management measures become less effective, jurisdictions may need to consider greater exchange rate flexibility, balancing the three competing objectives of monetary autonomy, exchange rate stability, and financial openness.
"The failure of a market player can quickly transmit shocks to other parts of the crypto-asset markets. If interconnections between crypto-asset activities and the traditional financial system were to increase, the spill-over effects may impact important parts of traditional finance."
Emerging markets and developing economies may face amplified macro-financial risks from crypto assets due to a less developed tax framework, large unbanked population, and larger cross-border transaction costs.
As part of its roadmap, the IMF, FSB, other international organisations, and standards-setting bodies are working towards building institutional capacity beyond G20 jurisdictions, enhancing global coordination, cooperation, and information sharing; and addressing data gaps necessary to understand the rapidly changing crypto-asset ecosystem.
[The Business Standard]
